Wulffmorgenthaler: Laughing about the serious

 Why do we laugh about the morally bad (seriousness is a moral category), about discrimination, pain, offences, grief, hurting, and the like? What is funny about de Sade writing in Juliette about chairs and tables made of naked women? Wherein lies the humour of Villiers de lIsle-Adams short story “The Swan-Killer” about a man choking a black swan in order to listen the swans beautiful song? Or why did the joke “the birthrate in Austria is in the basement” took its course after the scandal of Joseph Fritzl (locking up his own daughter for about 24 years and fathering her several times) became public?

 Usually we wouldn’t laugh about all of this when we could cut into such situations by acting on ourselves.

 In short, why is black humour funny?

 Black humour isn’t (spiteful, affectionate, or overcoming) schadenfreude. Neither is it sarcasm nor cynicism nor a resigned nor fatalistic laughter. The reason is, they all are applied in interactive situations whereas black humour isnt.

 Anyway, I cannot answer the question why it is funny and why we do laugh. Rather I try to describe some of the black humour experience and show ways of its justification.

 First, take the daring Fritzl-joke. After his bestiality became public people fell into sensationalism. Just to name two examples. The Austrian weekly newspaper News published “Die Memoiren eines Monsters” (“The memoirs of a monster”) accompanied by a large-scaled advertising. Besides, people wanted to know how Fritzls daughter, and their children, look like. The Austrian daily newspaper Österreich (which probably actually didnt know how she looks like) presented a computer simulated picture of her (on the basis of a photograph of her before she was maltreated and raped) how she may look like today – restricted with the ridiculous remark that this “picture” (age simulation) was manipulated in order to protect her from being recognised. Rather abysmally wicked was a Belgian photographer (and his clients). Papers were ready to pay 200.000 € for a photo of the Fritzl family. This photographer masqueraded as a therapist, sneaked into the clinic, and entered the familys therapy session. Thus, this black joke has an ironic function. Its to reveal the sensational masses: they are absolutely morally degenerated. Many would be offended by this joke, although they supported this horrible journalism. (Hence, the joke doesnt refer to the Fritzl family, rather to those being cruelly interested in then.) Of course this joke has its value of its own. “In the basement” means in German “low”. Actually the birthrate in Austria is low. But it was raised by Joseph Fritzl.

 Second, the whims of de Sade and Villiers de lIsle-Adam are totally surprising and unusual. (Furthermore) they are aesthetic through and through. So because of this uniqueness its difficult to determine the path they beaten towards their morally bad action.

 Third, we find black humour to be a way of dealing with ones own weaknesses and failures. Certain ideas of perfectionism and normality tend to extinguish individuality and human reality.

 As a matter of course one could give many more examples, functions, and the like. (Black humour can be used against the absolutism of political correctness, against certain arguments or ideas, as over-exaggeration, and so on.) But this should be enough for the moment. Finally let me give a summing-up: black humour has critical and liberating functions and operates in a situation in which we are relieved from action. 

 A perfect example are some of the comic strips the ingenious Danish duo Wulffmorgenthaler (Anders Morgenthaler: comic artist, childrens book author, film director, creator of childrens TV show; Mikael Wulff: illustrator, comedian) creates.

 What do you think about black humour and Wulffmorgenthaler? Do you think all of the comic strips are funny or some are not?

WARNING! Since this is about black humour, some of the comic strips maybe really offending to some people. Please do not have a look if you are easy to hurt by rude and rough humour!

3 responses to “Wulffmorgenthaler: Laughing about the serious

    • unfortunately I never saw Southpark except for the first episodes and later some extracts. but you’re right: they go to or even beyond the limits. 🙂
      with pamflet what do you mean? the genre or something else?

      • the genre. Thank you for the “Wulffmorgenthaler” translation. It says everything.

Well, I'd like to know: What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s